Navigation menu

Metroid Wiki:Featured Article Nomination/2011Archive

From Metroid Wiki

Tallon Metroid

Metroid art.png
Support Vote.png Support (Five Required)
  1. This article is decently fleshed out, full of references, and written in-universe. The information within is diverse and well-organized (with much more in-game material than at a certain website's equivalent which shall remain unnamed *COUGH*WIKIA*COUGH*). Front-page worthy. Embyr 75  --Talk-- 00:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
  2. I agree. The Tallon Metroids are a key part of the Prime series, and I can see nothing this article could improve on. It has all the details that make an article feature worthy. --Nintendbob 00:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
  3. It definitely falls within our requirements for FAs. This article is one of our finest, and it definitely deserves this recognition. Bop1996 (Talk | Unfinished projects) 00:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
  4. I concur with the above. Its amount of detail and overall organization reflect the care editors put into this wiki. If this doesn't deserve to be featured, I don't know what does. Metroid4Ever 05:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
  5. I think it is missing Pinball info, but that's really about it. There's always more info that can be added, even to featured articles. This one I think deserves featured status. Besides being a very important article regarding the Prime series, it's a very well organized article. --Malake256 {Talk | Contribs} 18:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Vote.png Opposition

Neutral Vote.png Neutral Comments


Chozo Ruins

Support Vote.png Support (Five Required)
Chozo Ruins 01.png
  1. This is one of our best articles, very detailed (and well referenced), and it should set the standard for what our other location pages should be. MKMetroid mf Sprite.gif 18:55, 11 February 2011 (EST)
  2. Lots of references, just the way I like it. And it's not just an out-of-universe listing of items and enemies, which is nice. Embyr 75  --Talk-- 20:58, 11 February 2011 (EST)
  3. I'm really liking this style of editing, it's what this Wiki needs. And I guess I won't have to annoy myself with UTC since you guys are using EST :) ZeldaMan (PostboxStatus) 21:16, 11 February 2010 (PCS)
  4. This article is one of the few that no longer needs any work, be it references or content, and so it seems a perfect new featured article. Plus, it has more detailed sections then the average article, giving it exeptional quality. --Nintendbob 07:28, 12 February 2011 (EST)
  5. The article is extremely organized and has various direct references. It has a very very nice writing of style which stands out from most articles around. It's an article to emulate, so I'm voting toward featured status. --Malake256 {Talk | Contribs} 13:24, 12 February 2011 (EST)
Oppose Vote.png Opposition

Neutral Vote.png Neutral Comments