Talk:Metroid Fusion

From Metroid Wiki

Feedback on the Story Section

Before I go on, I would like to have feedback on the story section. I need to know whether the level of detail that I write it in is okay, or if I should shorten it to only cover the more basic storyline information instead of every move that Samus does during the game. - Cobold 14:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I'd say go in less detail. Hightlight the main issues of Samus and the SA-X, Samus' re-acquisition of her powers, the crap with the Federation being secretive, etc... But don't make it read like a novel. ~Erimgard 22:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

2257 thinks that more story cannot hurt, while a short story summary might ommit facts that a few people would actually like to know from the article. - Cobold 22:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Ah, well I'm not exactly a wiki veteran, so I guess I'll defer on that one. However, I would suggest you elaborate on the Core X's a little more. ~Erimgard 22:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Given that we know Fusion's placement is post-Other M, but Other M has not yet been released, should it still say that it's chronologically after Super, or should it say after the yet to be released Other M? ~Erimgard 15:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion it should say Metroid Fusion is after Metroid: Other M. Metroid: Other M is a interquel between Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion, thus Metroid Fusion is still kind of the sequel of Super Metroid but no more the next Metroid game in chronological order. MOtherMetroid 16:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
I changed the article a bit (added links, etc.) and corrected it now that it's no more the next chronological game after Super Metroid. I hope no one's against this. MOtherMetroid 17:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The Article Itself

When I first saw this article, I noticed that, in terms or editing, it was very sloppy. Repeating links (I think I'm going to have a seizure with "Samus" floating everywhere), parentheses in the middle of a sentence (TRO, PAS, whatever, man...), effortless information ("a lot of energy" what the hell...), and even spelling mistakes (Adam Malxovixh.....). I don't mean to sound too terribly harsh, but...seriously!

Stub status

Does this page REALLY need the 'stub' banner on it? It's pretty well expanded. Findow 05:40, 01 August 2011

No it does not. It could be lengthier, but it's big enough to not be a stub. Because it is a page about a game, it certainly deserves to be longer and richer in info. --Malake256 {Talk | Contribs} 15:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC)