12
edits
Talk:Charge Combo: Difference between revisions
From Metroid Wiki
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
::::Anon#1: No, but evidently we perfected it. [[User:ChozoBoy|ChozoBoy]] 22:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ::::Anon#1: No, but evidently we perfected it. [[User:ChozoBoy|ChozoBoy]] 22:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::No, your writings are not creative writings. You are writing informative facts about a game which's information is free to anyone to write about. Creative writings are opinion pieces, short stories, books, or basically anything that wasn't written for the distinct purpose of giving people information. Wikis are encyclopedias, same rules apply. [[User:Leminnes|Leminnes]] 17:53 13 February 2010 (EST) | |||
:::::Throwing around legal mumbo jumbo? Wikia itself doesn't own copyright over the material the general public creates that is simply telling the facts from a material they do not own copyright over. As in, yes, Wikia owns the rights over it's user pages, community based pages, and theories/fanon. It does not own the text that is simply retelling the facts given to us by another property. Take ZI's walkthrough for Spirit Tracks. It is morally wrong to direct copy paste material - but this article isn't a direct copy paste, even if it seems some sentences may be, but it's not legally wrong under the CC license. What I am simply saying is, we don't support copy paste jobs, but the actual text on 90% of wikia's articles fall under public domain, which is part of the license Wikia uses. I am not saying that I support articles looking similar, but I am dissapointed in seeing your guys reaction. You are at our wiki, complaining about our article, instead of going to your own and making it better. Here, by the end of the day, come back and check out my superior work when I am through with this page. [[User:Nathanial Rumphol-Janc|Nathanial Rumphol-Janc]] 22:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | :::::Throwing around legal mumbo jumbo? Wikia itself doesn't own copyright over the material the general public creates that is simply telling the facts from a material they do not own copyright over. As in, yes, Wikia owns the rights over it's user pages, community based pages, and theories/fanon. It does not own the text that is simply retelling the facts given to us by another property. Take ZI's walkthrough for Spirit Tracks. It is morally wrong to direct copy paste material - but this article isn't a direct copy paste, even if it seems some sentences may be, but it's not legally wrong under the CC license. What I am simply saying is, we don't support copy paste jobs, but the actual text on 90% of wikia's articles fall under public domain, which is part of the license Wikia uses. I am not saying that I support articles looking similar, but I am dissapointed in seeing your guys reaction. You are at our wiki, complaining about our article, instead of going to your own and making it better. Here, by the end of the day, come back and check out my superior work when I am through with this page. [[User:Nathanial Rumphol-Janc|Nathanial Rumphol-Janc]] 22:31, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
