Navigation menu
Talk:Luminoth: Difference between revisions
From Metroid Wiki
Latest comment: 18 March 2010 by Nathanial Rumphol-Janc
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Well, this is somewhat familiar. [http://metroid.wikia.com/wiki/Luminoth I wonder…] Sarcasm aside, I also find that the [[Queen Metroid]] and [[Spazer Beam]] articles of the same nature, being paraphrased off of our wiki. You clearly state in your [[Metroid Wiki:Quality Standards|Quality Standards]] that things like this shouldn't happen, yet they continue to persist. Kindly remind your users to stop plagiarizing from Wikitroid articles at once; paraphrasing off of Wikitroid without citing us is still considered plagiarism. Thanks, '''[[User:RAN1|<font color="darkred">R</font>]][[User talk:RAN1|<font color="navy">A</font>]][[Special:Contributions/RAN1|<font color="darkgreen">N</font>]]1''' 20:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | Well, this is somewhat familiar. [http://metroid.wikia.com/wiki/Luminoth I wonder…] Sarcasm aside, I also find that the [[Queen Metroid]] and [[Spazer Beam]] articles of the same nature, being paraphrased off of our wiki. You clearly state in your [[Metroid Wiki:Quality Standards|Quality Standards]] that things like this shouldn't happen, yet they continue to persist. Kindly remind your users to stop plagiarizing from Wikitroid articles at once; paraphrasing off of Wikitroid without citing us is still considered plagiarism. Thanks, '''[[User:RAN1|<font color="darkred">R</font>]][[User talk:RAN1|<font color="navy">A</font>]][[Special:Contributions/RAN1|<font color="darkgreen">N</font>]]1''' 20:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Hey. Just checked it out, and I certainly agree that it was pretty much paraphrased from Wikitroid. I'm not in charge of anything, though, so I'll leave any official commenting to the staff, but I can assure you that this wiki will not stand for that at all.{{:User:Neo/sig}} 23:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | :Hey. Just checked it out, and I certainly agree that it was pretty much paraphrased from Wikitroid. I'm not in charge of anything, though, so I'll leave any official commenting to the staff, but I can assure you that this wiki will not stand for that at all.{{:User:Neo/sig}} 23:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:The first time I read this was after Neo edited and I was like "what the hell is going on? Nothing is wrong..." I quickly realized the issue via the history tab. Rest assured we do not approve of this sort of work and like Neo did here, we plan to fix it on all the pages you mentioned. It's not like we are encouraging our members to do this, as you clearly can see in that standards page you linked it isn't something we condone. I reminded the user who did this on his talk page about our standards. [[User:Nathanial Rumphol-Janc|Nathanial Rumphol-Janc]] 23:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:39, 18 March 2010
Well, this is somewhat familiar. I wonder… Sarcasm aside, I also find that the Queen Metroid and Spazer Beam articles of the same nature, being paraphrased off of our wiki. You clearly state in your Quality Standards that things like this shouldn't happen, yet they continue to persist. Kindly remind your users to stop plagiarizing from Wikitroid articles at once; paraphrasing off of Wikitroid without citing us is still considered plagiarism. Thanks, RAN1 20:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hey. Just checked it out, and I certainly agree that it was pretty much paraphrased from Wikitroid. I'm not in charge of anything, though, so I'll leave any official commenting to the staff, but I can assure you that this wiki will not stand for that at all._Neo(U) (T) (C)(Home) 23:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- The first time I read this was after Neo edited and I was like "what the hell is going on? Nothing is wrong..." I quickly realized the issue via the history tab. Rest assured we do not approve of this sort of work and like Neo did here, we plan to fix it on all the pages you mentioned. It's not like we are encouraging our members to do this, as you clearly can see in that standards page you linked it isn't something we condone. I reminded the user who did this on his talk page about our standards. Nathanial Rumphol-Janc 23:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
