Navigation menu
Metroid Wiki:Discussion Center: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(→Now,I have a question: new section) |
||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
:Thanks for that, it's much better. Yeah, the approach with that edittools template is to have them there, so that in the rare case they are needed, they're already there. {{:User:Melchizedek/sig}} 11:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | :Thanks for that, it's much better. Yeah, the approach with that edittools template is to have them there, so that in the rare case they are needed, they're already there. {{:User:Melchizedek/sig}} 11:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Now,I have a question == | |||
Along with a true wiki,which gives facts,is it also a Fanon type wiki? |
Revision as of 00:45, 24 February 2010
Editing
I Noticed while editing the left side of the edit box is buggy. You cannot click on anything near the left side. For example: While editing this I wouldn't be able to select the first word... -Sephiner Shaeld
- Yeah, that is correct. I think it might be a skin bug. Nothing within two characters of the left side of the edit box can be clicked on. You'll have to bear with it for now, but I assure you we are looking into fixing this issue. -Melchizedek talk 06:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that the portlets in the sidebar overlap the content. http://metroidwiki.org/skins/monobook1/main.css?207 has this:
.portlet { margin-bottom: 1.5em; padding-left: 35px; position: relative; z-index: 5; font-weight: bold; text-transform: none; width: 200px; }
- Changing the width to 180px fixes the issue for me.
#content { margin-left: 205px; z-index: 4; border: 0; }
- Thanks for that 2257. I hadn't gotten a chance to look into it yet, but as you pointed out the solution, I've made the change, and it has fixed the issue for me. Hopefully for everyone else too. Thanks again. -Melchizedek talk 09:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
User Stylesheets
Are broken. 2257(t) 06:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- I would call 'not yet enabled' a tad different from 'broken', but give it time, and I'll let you know when it is enabled. -Melchizedek talk 09:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, the MediaWiki default is for it to be disabled. Both Custom user CSS and JS have now been enabled. I have tested and they are working, so let me know how you go. -Melchizedek talk 23:29, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Signatures
I think that we could stand to import this, as it makes creating template signatures simpler for users. 2257(t) 08:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- I'm liking the look of that. We very well may implement it. :) -Melchizedek talk 09:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Edittools
The Japanese sections should be changed to this:
<small id="edittools_newsectionshere"> '''<u>Hiragana</u>:''' <charinsert> あ い う え お </charinsert> <charinsert> か き く け こ </charinsert> <charinsert> さ し す せ そ </charinsert> <charinsert> た ち つ て と </charinsert> <charinsert> な に ぬ ね の </charinsert> <charinsert> は ひ ふ へ ほ </charinsert> <charinsert> ま み む め も </charinsert> <charinsert> や ゆ よ </charinsert> <charinsert> ら り る れ ろ </charinsert> <charinsert> わ ゐ ゑ を </charinsert> <charinsert> ん </charinsert> <charinsert> が ぎ ぐ げ ご </charinsert> <charinsert> ざ じ ず ぜ ぞ </charinsert> <charinsert> だ ぢ づ で ど </charinsert> <charinsert> ば び ぶ べ ぼ </charinsert> <charinsert> ぱ ぴ ぷ ぺ ぽ </charinsert> <charinsert> ゔ </charinsert> <charinsert> ゃ ゅ ょ </charinsert> <charinsert> ぁ ぃ ぅ ぇ ぉ </charinsert> <charinsert> ゎ っ </charinsert> <charinsert> ゝ ゞ </charinsert> </small> <br> <small id="edittools_newsectionshere"> '''<u>Katakana</u>:''' <charinsert> ア イ ウ エ オ </charinsert> <charinsert> カ キ ク ケ コ </charinsert> <charinsert> サ シ ス セ ソ </charinsert> <charinsert> タ チ ツ テ ト </charinsert> <charinsert> ナ ニ ヌ ネ ノ </charinsert> <charinsert> ハ ヒ フ ヘ ホ </charinsert> <charinsert> マ ミ ム メ モ </charinsert> <charinsert> ヤ ユ ヨ </charinsert> <charinsert> ラ リ ル レ ロ </charinsert> <charinsert> ワ ヰ ヱ ヲ </charinsert> <charinsert> ン </charinsert> <charinsert> ガ ギ グ ゲ ゴ </charinsert> <charinsert> ザ ジ ズ ゼ ゾ </charinsert> <charinsert> ダ ヂ ヅ デ ド </charinsert> <charinsert> バ ビ ブ ベ ボ </charinsert> <charinsert> パ ピ プ ペ ポ </charinsert> <charinsert> ヷ ヸ ヴ ヹ ヺ </charinsert> <charinsert> ャ ュ ョ </charinsert> <charinsert> ァ ィ ゥ ェ ォ </charinsert> <charinsert> ヵ ヶ ヮ ッ </charinsert> <charinsert> ー ・ ヽ ヾ </charinsert> </small>
Although in reality, some of these are so rare that nobody's likely to ever need them, it seems that it's better to have them and never need them, than to need them but not have them. Right? (A few very common kana are also missing.) 2257(t) 10:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, it's much better. Yeah, the approach with that edittools template is to have them there, so that in the rare case they are needed, they're already there. -Melchizedek talk 11:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Now,I have a question
Along with a true wiki,which gives facts,is it also a Fanon type wiki?