Editing Talk:Darkling Tentacle
From Metroid Wiki
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This article claims that Darkling Tentacles are a kind of Ing, but by definition isn't a Darkling a symbiotically possessed creature? If that's the case, shouldn't Darkling Tentacles be categorized on the navigation template under Darklings, not Ing? {{:User:Embyr_75/sig}} 16:28, 6 April 2011 (EDT) | This article claims that Darkling Tentacles are a kind of Ing, but by definition isn't a Darkling a symbiotically possessed creature? If that's the case, shouldn't Darkling Tentacles be categorized on the navigation template under Darklings, not Ing? {{:User:Embyr_75/sig}} 16:28, 6 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Going to bump this now. The Logbook classifies them as an Ing entity, not a Darkling. This means that they aren't possessed Tentacles, but are dark Ing in the form of Tentacles. Since they aren't a Darkling like the rest are, we can't really classify them as Darklings, despite the name's obvious implications, and the fact that the Logbook refers to them as "darklings"; this is a broader usage of the term rather than the specific term used to designate Ing-possessed Aetherian creatures. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} 02:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC) | :Going to bump this now. The Logbook classifies them as an Ing entity, not a Darkling. This means that they aren't possessed Tentacles, but are dark Ing in the form of Tentacles. Since they aren't a Darkling like the rest are, we can't really classify them as Darklings, despite the name's obvious implications, and the fact that the Logbook refers to them as "darklings"; this is a broader usage of the term rather than the specific term used to designate Ing-possessed Aetherian creatures. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} 02:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
