Navigation menu
Talk:Metroid Fusion: Difference between revisions
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Ah, well I'm not exactly a wiki veteran, so I guess I'll defer on that one. However, I would suggest you elaborate on the Core X's a little more. [[User:Erimgard|~Erimgard]] 22:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Ah, well I'm not exactly a wiki veteran, so I guess I'll defer on that one. However, I would suggest you elaborate on the Core X's a little more. [[User:Erimgard|~Erimgard]] 22:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Given that we know Fusion's placement is post-Other M, but Other M has not yet been released, should it still say that it's chronologically after Super, or should it say after the yet to be released Other M? [[User:Erimgard|~Erimgard]] 15:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:09, 25 April 2010
Feedback on the Story Section
Before I go on, I would like to have feedback on the story section. I need to know whether the level of detail that I write it in is okay, or if I should shorten it to only cover the more basic storyline information instead of every move that Samus does during the game. - Cobold 14:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
I'd say go in less detail. Hightlight the main issues of Samus and the SA-X, Samus' re-acquisition of her powers, the crap with the Federation being secretive, etc... But don't make it read like a novel. ~Erimgard 22:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- 2257 thinks that more story cannot hurt, while a short story summary might ommit facts that a few people would actually like to know from the article. - Cobold 22:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, well I'm not exactly a wiki veteran, so I guess I'll defer on that one. However, I would suggest you elaborate on the Core X's a little more. ~Erimgard 22:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Given that we know Fusion's placement is post-Other M, but Other M has not yet been released, should it still say that it's chronologically after Super, or should it say after the yet to be released Other M? ~Erimgard 15:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)