Talk:Metroid Fusion

Feedback on the Story Section

Before I go on, I would like to have feedback on the story section. I need to know whether the level of detail that I write it in is okay, or if I should shorten it to only cover the more basic storyline information instead of every move that Samus does during the game. - Cobold 14:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I'd say go in less detail. Hightlight the main issues of Samus and the SA-X, Samus' re-acquisition of her powers, the crap with the Federation being secretive, etc... But don't make it read like a novel. ~Erimgard 22:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

2257 thinks that more story cannot hurt, while a short story summary might ommit facts that a few people would actually like to know from the article. - Cobold 22:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah, well I'm not exactly a wiki veteran, so I guess I'll defer on that one. However, I would suggest you elaborate on the Core X's a little more. ~Erimgard 22:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Given that we know Fusion's placement is post-Other M, but Other M has not yet been released, should it still say that it's chronologically after Super, or should it say after the yet to be released Other M? ~Erimgard 15:09, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion it should say Metroid Fusion is after Metroid: Other M. Metroid: Other M is a interquel between Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion, thus Metroid Fusion is still kind of the sequel of Super Metroid but no more the next Metroid game in chronological order. MOtherMetroid 16:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)