Navigation menu
Metroid Wiki:Featured Article Nomination/2011Archive: Difference between revisions
From Metroid Wiki
Metroidking (talk | contribs) m (Protected "Metroid Wiki:Featured Article Nomination/2011Archive" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archive}} | {{Archive}} | ||
==[[Tallon Metroid]]== | |||
[[File:Metroid_art.png|155px|right|link=Tallon Metroid]] | |||
{{User Support}} | |||
#This article is decently fleshed out, full of references, and written in-universe. The information within is diverse and well-organized (with much more in-game material than at a certain website's equivalent which shall remain unnamed *COUGH*WIKIA*COUGH*). Front-page worthy. {{:User:Embyr_75/sig}} 00:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
#I agree. The Tallon Metroids are a key part of the Prime series, and I can see nothing this article could improve on. It has all the details that make an article feature worthy. --{{:User:Nintendbob/sig}} 00:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
#It definitely falls within our requirements for FAs. This article is one of our finest, and it definitely deserves this recognition. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} 00:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
#I concur with the above. Its amount of detail and overall organization reflect the care editors put into this wiki. If this doesn't deserve to be featured, I don't know what does. [[User:Metroid4Ever|<span style="font-family:vivaldi;color:white"><font size="5.5"><b>Metroid</b></font></span>]][[User talk:Metroid4Ever|<span style="font-family:vivaldi;color:white"><font size="5.5"><b>4Ever</b></font></span>]] 05:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
#I think it is missing ''Pinball'' info, but that's really about it. There's always more info that can be added, even to featured articles. This one I think deserves featured status. Besides being a very important article regarding the ''Prime'' series, it's a very well organized article. {{:User:Malake256/sig}} 18:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{oppose}} | |||
{{neutral}} | |||
==[[Chozo Ruins]]== | ==[[Chozo Ruins]]== | ||
{{User Support}} | {{User Support}} |
Latest revision as of 15:20, 29 July 2011
Tallon Metroid
Support (Five Required)
- This article is decently fleshed out, full of references, and written in-universe. The information within is diverse and well-organized (with much more in-game material than at a certain website's equivalent which shall remain unnamed *COUGH*WIKIA*COUGH*). Front-page worthy. —Embyr 75 --Talk-- 00:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. The Tallon Metroids are a key part of the Prime series, and I can see nothing this article could improve on. It has all the details that make an article feature worthy. --Nintendbob 00:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- It definitely falls within our requirements for FAs. This article is one of our finest, and it definitely deserves this recognition. Bop1996 (Talk | Unfinished projects) 00:48, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I concur with the above. Its amount of detail and overall organization reflect the care editors put into this wiki. If this doesn't deserve to be featured, I don't know what does. Metroid4Ever 05:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I think it is missing Pinball info, but that's really about it. There's always more info that can be added, even to featured articles. This one I think deserves featured status. Besides being a very important article regarding the Prime series, it's a very well organized article. --Malake256 {Talk | Contribs} 18:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Opposition
Chozo Ruins
Support (Five Required)
- This is one of our best articles, very detailed (and well referenced), and it should set the standard for what our other location pages should be. MK 18:55, 11 February 2011 (EST)
- Lots of references, just the way I like it. And it's not just an out-of-universe listing of items and enemies, which is nice. —Embyr 75 --Talk-- 20:58, 11 February 2011 (EST)
- I'm really liking this style of editing, it's what this Wiki needs. And I guess I won't have to annoy myself with UTC since you guys are using EST :) ZeldaMan (PostboxStatus) 21:16, 11 February 2010 (PCS)
- This article is one of the few that no longer needs any work, be it references or content, and so it seems a perfect new featured article. Plus, it has more detailed sections then the average article, giving it exeptional quality. --Nintendbob 07:28, 12 February 2011 (EST)
- The article is extremely organized and has various direct references. It has a very very nice writing of style which stands out from most articles around. It's an article to emulate, so I'm voting toward featured status. --Malake256 {Talk | Contribs} 13:24, 12 February 2011 (EST)
Opposition