12,485
edits
Talk:Metroid Fusion: Difference between revisions
From Metroid Wiki
m
no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:In my opinion it should say Metroid Fusion is after Metroid: Other M. Metroid: Other M is a interquel between Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion, thus Metroid Fusion is still kind of the sequel of Super Metroid but no more the next Metroid game in chronological order. [[User:MOtherMetroid|MOtherMetroid]] 16:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | :In my opinion it should say Metroid Fusion is after Metroid: Other M. Metroid: Other M is a interquel between Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion, thus Metroid Fusion is still kind of the sequel of Super Metroid but no more the next Metroid game in chronological order. [[User:MOtherMetroid|MOtherMetroid]] 16:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I changed the article a bit (added links, etc.) and corrected it now that it's no more the next chronological game after Super Metroid. I hope no one's against this. [[User:MOtherMetroid|MOtherMetroid]] 17:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
== The Article Itself == | |||
When I first saw this article, I noticed that, in terms or editing, it was very sloppy. Repeating links (I think I'm going to have a seizure with "Samus" floating everywhere), parentheses in the middle of a sentence (TRO, PAS, whatever, man...), effortless information ("a lot of energy" what the hell...), and even spelling mistakes (Adam Malxovixh.....). I don't mean to sound too terribly harsh, but...seriously! | |||
==Stub status== | |||
Does this page REALLY need the 'stub' banner on it? It's pretty well expanded. [[User:Findow|Findow]] 05:40, 01 August 2011 | |||
:No it does not. It could be lengthier, but it's big enough to not be a stub. Because it is a page about a game, it certainly deserves to be longer and richer in info. {{:User:Malake256/sig}} 15:23, 1 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
