Talk:Orange Phazon: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:43, 12 March 2012 (edit) Metroidking (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Name?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:40, 13 March 2012 (edit) (undo) Bop1996 (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Name?) Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:The one that made the article is long gone so I don't think he can answer this, but I think he just went by its color for the name. If the guide that WT used is official then we should rename this article. {{:User:Metroidking/sig}} 21:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)		:The one that made the article is long gone so I don't think he can answer this, but I think he just went by its color for the name. If the guide that WT used is official then we should rename this article. {{:User:Metroidking/sig}} 21:43, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

			::I'm not sure if there's scan data or really anything to back it up. I will say that the Prima guides have very dubious information in a lot of cases and should only be used as a last resort for naming where there is absolutely no clue as to what to do about something. It's very likely just blue Phazon except minus the effects the Phazon Suit has on normal Phazon and colored orange instead to the game engine, so I don't think Orange Phazon is much of a stretch (and it's very obviously closer to orange than red), so if we use that template for conjectural names (the name of which escapes me for the moment), that seems to be our best option. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} 01:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Navigation menu