Talk:Shriekbat: Difference between revisions

Talk:Shriekbat (edit)

348 bytes added , 30 December 2010

m

no edit summary

12,485

edits

Revision as of 03:55, 30 December 2010 (edit) Embyr 75 (talk \| contribs) m (Subspecies)		Revision as of 06:40, 30 December 2010 (edit) (undo) Malake256 (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	SO! Are each of the subspecies of Shriekbat (like Ice Shriekbats, for example) going to get their own articles? I only ask because this article currently lists several different subspecies of Shriekbat, along with some brief description, and none of them are redlinked to (potential) new pages. Furthermore, Shriekbat subspecies aren't on the enemies template. Thoughts, anyone? {{:User:Embyr_75/sig}} 03:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)		SO! Are each of the subspecies of Shriekbat (like Ice Shriekbats, for example) going to get their own articles? I only ask because this article currently lists several different subspecies of Shriekbat, along with some brief description, and none of them are redlinked to (potential) new pages. Furthermore, Shriekbat subspecies aren't on the enemies template. Thoughts, anyone? {{:User:Embyr_75/sig}} 03:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

			:SO! Definitely. Each subspecies of Shriekbat gets it's own article. Yes, each article will be smaller, but they're different species. And that's what the point to "main=Shriekbat" in the Enemy-infobox. And the common enemies template is bleh. It seems to have caused many problems like that. {{:User:Malake256/sig}} 06:40, 30 December 2010 (UTC)